Thursday, November 02, 2006

“That’s it. You people have stood in my way long enough. I’m going to clown college.”


One day, I was flipping through a magazine and I saw the most effective advertisement I’ve ever seen. The ad was a picture of an overturned cookie jar with Mini Milanos spilling out onto a table.

When I saw the ad, I thought, “Man, I really want a Mini Milano.” Then I thought, “Man, I really want a cookie jar.”

Wednesday, November 01, 2006

“The politics of failure have failed. We need to make them work again.”


The upcoming election has put into stark relief an important issue: how do you pick a representative that best represents your interests?
There are innumerable criteria that may be used in picking a candidate, but I would like to identify a few that seem to be particularly relevant to this election.

Seniority. One of the arguments that Senator Orrin Hatch from Utah is making as to why he should be reelected is that he is a senior member of congress and will soon be the ranking member or chairman of the Senate Finance Committee. He argues that this makes him a better voice for Utah. I disagree.

First, he is no longer accountable to Utah voters. His overwhelming popularity and financial backing shield him from voter accountability. He can take for granted that he will win every election in which he runs. Since he doesn’t have to worry about winning support, he is basically free to follow whatever agenda he wants without fear of repercussion. This frees him up to follow only the interests of his donors and other special interests, rather than those of his constituents. To wit, he has accepted money from Tobacco companies; he voted to repeal the death tax (which affects only a small fraction of Utahns, but provides important revenue; and has accepted a vast majority of his contributions from out-of-state donors. (Links are to The Center for Responsive Politics.)

Second, divided government is key to the success of American democracy. Ours is a system of checks and balances where the power of the state is checked by pitting it at war with itself. Unfortunately, political parties have provided a way of muting that benefit. (Please understand, I am not arguing that political parties are inherently bad – in fact, I feel quite the opposite. This is just an unfortunate side effect.) When the same party controls different branches of government, the incentive to oppose acts of the other branches is largely removed. So, when Democrats control the White House and Congress, they are more likely to cede power between them than they would be when the two branches are controlled by different parties. We have seen this since 2001, as Congress has continued to cede more and more power to the Executive without retaining substantive oversight power. Senator Hatch has been a strong voice in favor of these concessions. Therefore, the interests of Utahns might be better served by electing a Democrat and turning the reigns of Congress over to a different party.

I do not mean to state that only Orrin Hatch should not be re-elected, but I mean to say that Utahns might not want to send ANY Republicans back to Washington this election.

Friday, October 27, 2006

The Great Equalizer


The advent of the internet has changed the very way our world works. It has made available a vast wealth of knowledge to anyone who can find a computer with a phone line. Cisco CEO John Chambers called it, "the great equalizer." Presumably, he meant that communication through the internet puts everyone on an equal plane. Giant multinational corporations, world superpower governments, and crackpot individuals can all put their web pages side by side on a virtual stage. This new borderless democracy has attracted many citizens who are best described by something Homer Simpson said: "These are the people who saw an overcrowded marketplace and cried, 'Me too!'"

Now that I have a chance to have my voice greatly equalized, I cry, "Me too!"