tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36657212.post799978527528857141..comments2023-09-22T09:27:07.525-07:00Comments on Candid Opinions: "Special Delivery!"Danielhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12854415186783745776noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-36657212.post-55638087018645422612007-10-25T21:39:00.000-07:002007-10-25T21:39:00.000-07:00I agree with your conclusion that suicide bombers ...I agree with your conclusion that suicide bombers are cowards. They lack the morals like courage that other suicide warfare of say, the Kamikaze pilots of WWII. Those pilots only targeted military targets to try to take out as many enemies as possible. A suicide bomber targets military unit and innocent women and children with no discrimination of either. If the end action of a suicide bomber is to, lets say, hurt an invading army, then that is a reasonable action. However the end does not justify the means. Attacking the invading army is good, if it doesn’t unmusically harm innocent bystanders unrelated to the conflict. This is where the Kamikaze and suicide bombers differ. Both had the same end intended, but the mean chosen, and the end achieved very greatly. Acting in a couragasly moral way requires more than just killing one’s self for a cause. The cause has to be just. The means chosen must be reasonable. And the end result must be morally responsible. Otherwise “the end does not justify the means.”Allenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12024230022576830290noreply@blogger.com